Quantcast

John Sahag / Keratin Treatment

It’s been six months since my last Keratin treatment, so yesterday afternoon I stopped into John Sahag to see my buddy Doug Macintosh (who also does color).

Before you start the treatment, they use a clarifying shampoo to strip out all the products on your hair (including any lingering traces of Keratin), returning it to its “natural” state.

This is my hair’s natural state following a quick blow-dry. This is also why I am so on board with Keratin.

And this is what my hair looks like for up to six months afterwards. Go here for a ton more info on the process, including a video that explains the treatment and a run-down of how treated hair behaves in different conditions.

One thing I’ve been meaning to mention: I know there’s a lot of controversy swirling around these days about the Brazilian Blowout, a similar relaxing treatment. My friend Nadine has actually written extensively on the subject: like me, she believes that while people should be able to make their own decisions about whether or not to try potentially dangerous treatments, it is not okay for a company to (deliberately, if you believe the allegations – and I do) fail to provide accurate information to consumers.

Anyway, a couple of weeks ago I got a phone call from the Post, asking if they could interview me about the subject. I was extremely concerned, because I had been under the impression that the treatment that I get is – at least as far as we know – safe, and the last thing I want is to be praising a treatment that has the potential to cause serious side effects both for consumers and for salon technicians. But then the reporter asked me the specific name of the treatment I’ve been using, and when I said “the Keratin Complex Smoothing Therapy Treatment,” her response was “Oh. That’s fine. That’s not the one under fire.” And that was that. I’ll certainly keep you posted if I hear any other rumors swirling around, but for now it seems that the Brazilian Blowout is the one to steer clear of.

If you’ve been trying the Brazilian Blowout (or if you’re unsure which product your salon uses), I encourage you to read up on the subject: the treatment promotes itself as being “formaldehyde-free!” and “salon-safe!”, but laboratory tests have shown that the products do indeed contain high levels of formaldehyde (a known carcinogen). And the manufacturers, it seems, have been actively keeping this information from the public, and from the salons offering the treatment (that, to my mind, is worst of all, because of course its the technicians who are in the greatest danger if the products turn out to be highly carcinogenic).

As Nadine writes, “For me, the parallels to Big Tobacco are clear. You want to smoke? At least now we all know it’s bad for us – we’re big boys and girls, and it’s your health, your right and your funeral. To actively claim and aggressively promote the message of zero health risks…when it appears that the opposite may be true? Hell, no.”



You Might Also Like:


  • Kella

    I’m confused. Why did you say it was safe then if you had read Nadine Jolie’s blog? It sound like you just didnt’ read it.

  • Kella

    I’m confused. Why did you say it was safe then if you had read Nadine Jolie’s blog? It sound like you just didnt’ read it.

  • Pioneer Abby

    Hi Jordan,

    I just took a look at Nadine's website and it looks like the Keratin Complex Smoothing Therapy Treatment has 7.5 times the safe limit http://nadinejolie.com/blog/2010/10/formaldehyde-testing-results-for-brazilian-keratin-blowout-companies/. I used to have keratin treatments (not sure what kind) and loved them, but honestly don't think the health risks are worth it.

  • jordanreid

    Here's what I think: new facts come out about stuff like this all the time, and the important thing is to keep investigating and examining so that all the information is there for us to use as we will. I think that if you're concerned, definitely skip it, or at least hold off for awhile. The best thing that can come from this controversy is increased pressure on companies (ALL companies) to disclose any potential dangers associated with their products, so that consumers can make informed decisions about whether or not they want to take on the risk. If I learn that a product is bad for me, I may decide that it's worth the risk, or I may decide that it's not…but I want the decision to be mine.

  • Kella

    Jordan, no offense and I hope you won’t do the usual thing of deleting posts as you did with my other pretty respectful one: why don’t you admit you made a mistake and didn’t see your treatment on NJ’s list? It seems clear to me. In your post you are either saying you believe it’s safe and that NJ’s list supports that OR you know that’s not the case and you’re deliberately misleading your readers because you own your hair salon a seemingly glowing post (for more free hair treatments.) Which is it? I need to know to trust your site or not? Lately, it seems all sponsored posts, ads, and infomercials. Please clarify.

  • Kella

    Jordan, no offense and I hope you won’t do the usual thing of deleting posts as you did with my other pretty respectful one: why don’t you admit you made a mistake and didn’t see your treatment on NJ’s list? It seems clear to me. In your post you are either saying you believe it’s safe and that NJ’s list supports that OR you know that’s not the case and you’re deliberately misleading your readers because you own your hair salon a seemingly glowing post (for more free hair treatments.) Which is it? I need to know to trust your site or not? Lately, it seems all sponsored posts, ads, and infomercials. Please clarify.

  • jordanreid

    Based on what I have heard from various sources – including the NY Post reporter – I personally feel comfortable using the product for the time being. But is it possible that all of these types of products contain more formaldehyde than they state on the packaging? Is it possible that they're safe for consumers, but not necessarily for salon technicians? Hell, yeah, it's possible…which is why it's important that we continue this conversation and continue to encourage companies to inform us about the potential dangers associated with their products.

  • Reader

    If the chemicals are dangerous to anyone, it's the salon workers who inhale them day in and day out, not the consumers who are exposed twice a year. Safe exposure levels dictated by the EPA take this into account, so safe “worker” exposure levels will be set at a much lower rate than “public” exposure levels. If you have reason to believe these chemicals harm anyone at all, then you are complicit ethically. You're not merely making the choice to expose yourself to the chemicals–you're funding a exposes others. Either you're OK with that or you're not–hell, I make harmful choices everyday–but at least acknowledge that this is about more than what you “feel comfortable” with.

  • jordanreid

    Hey there Kella,
    I deleted your previous comment because it was rude.
    I've read many of Nadine's posts on this subject, but no, I didn't see the particular post that you're referring to. Based on my conversations with Nadine and others, however, I personally feel comfortable using it. Not everyone would, though, which is why I wanted to refer those who are interested in learning more to a site that has explored this issue very thoroughly. I use the product; I like the product; I am interested in providing resources to my readers beyond my personal opinions, which is why I recommended reading Nadine's site.

  • Nadine Jolie

    Jordan and I have had many conversations about the Brazilian Blowout and formaldehyde treatments, and I know she would NEVER deliberately mislead her readers – I’ve witnessed firsthand time and again the enormous amount of work, thought and care she puts into this blog. The last thing she would ever do is sell you all out. The BB controversy is quite tricky because new information keeps being released, companies are hurtling all sorts of accusations and counter accusations at one another, and those who love the treatments’ admittedly stellar results are accused of being dupes and fools, while those who feels the treatment is dangerous are accused of starting a witch hunt.

    Deciding to have any Brazilian straightening treatment is a personal choice, but one that I think you all deserve to make with as many facts and as much information at your disposal as possible. We’re all doing our best to learn and disseminate the correct info to pass onto our readers, and then allow you to make informed decisions. As Jordan says above, she hadn’t read my one particular post where I shared little-known information about formaldehyde levels in one test conducted, but she has been keeping an ear to the ground—mostly through me, as I’ve spent an enormous amount of time researching this the past few months. We’ve discussed the Keratin Complex—which does not blatantly market themselves as formaldehyde-free, like good ol’ BB does—and discussed the pros and cons. Like many people, armed with the info she’d learned, Jordan made the decision to continue with the treatment twice a year, something I—as somebody who uses microwaves and a cell phone, slathers beauty products with parabens all over myself, douses herself in perfume (which is—surprise!—often loaded with aldehydes), smoked for several years (I know, I know—but at least I finally quit!) and drinks copious amounts of vodka and wine—cannot fault her for.

    As we learn more info, as the true health risks (or not) become clear, and as we learn more about whether these companies have been marketing themselves deceptively or not, our opinions will surely continue to evolve and change. For the time being, however, exercise a wee bit of caution and just use your best judgment. While I personally don’t like these treatments, there’s no need for hysteria—realistically speaking, nobody’s going to drop dead after 1 treatment. Unfortunately, there’s formaldehyde everywhere.

  • Amanda

    But isn't the point that there's an issue here that's bigger than your personal comfort? You might be comfortable with the safety level of undergoing this treatment twice a year, but the technicians who administer the treatment are more at risk of experiencing negative side effects from exposure and they don't have the same freedom to refuse the exposure that the consumer does. Framing this as merely a question of consumer safety erases those risks to the workers.

  • http://twitter.com/NakamuraToki Nakamura Toki

    You look great! I've been using Maxliss keratin at home for 8 months and my hair has never looked better! This is their page if you're interested: http://www.maxliss-keratin.com

  • reader

    Keratin complex does blatantly claim to be formaldehyde free!..They also try to confuse stylists and consumers by claiming their product has “encapsulated aldehydes”, and is safe….Really??…When heated with blow dryer/flat iron fumes turn to toxic levels of formaldehyde.

    What about the unsuspecting people in the salon such as other employees, clients, children, pregnant, nursing mothers that are being exposed to the fumes?????